[SEL] Re: Pinned Rings - Problems or Not?

Steve Royster steve_royster at hotmail.com
Thu Apr 21 12:01:13 PDT 2005


Yes Dave, You hit it right on. The axles were reversed with the right on 
left and the left on right and everytime I pulled it down the driveway the 
nuts unscrewed themselves and the wheels  fell off. I can't figger out how 
to fix this problem so  I push it now insterad of pulling it to shows! But 
on Mondays and Fridays it doesn't seem to matter very much.  The Oystered 
Cloister

>From: Dave Rotigel <rotigel at alltel.net>
>Reply-To: The SEL email discussion list <sel at lists.stationary-engine.com>
>To: The SEL email discussion list <sel at lists.stationary-engine.com>
>Subject: Re: [SEL] Re: Pinned Rings - Problems or Not?
>Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 23:56:05 -0400
>
>Hi Steve,
>         Many workers in the Hercules plant had a drinking problem. (Karch 
>did not report this in his book out of respect for the many widows that 
>they left behind.) In any event, this problem led to many carts being put 
>together improperly on Mondays and Fridays. Not only were there instances 
>of nuts being put on upside down, but there were also instances of left 
>side wheels being put on the right side of the carts and visa-versa.
>         I suggest that the cart that you took apart was likely built on 
>either a Monday or a Friday. Did you notice which side the wheels were on?
>         Dave
>PS, Glenn and I discussed this problem at several shows last year and we 
>both agree that it's a terrible thing to have your nuts on upside down!
>
>At 10:51 PM 4/20/2005, you wrote:
>>Speaking of the square nuts thread..... I recently took apart a Hercules 
>>cart and guess what? every single square nut was on with the roundover 
>>side down! and I guarantee with all the rust I encountered , it had never 
>>been apart before! So, who knows what those Hercules engineers were 
>>thinking? Steve in Asheville, N.C.
>>
>>>From: Curt <curt at imc-group.com>
>>>Reply-To: The SEL email discussion list <sel at lists.stationary-engine.com>
>>>To: The SEL email discussion list <sel at lists.stationary-engine.com>
>>>Subject: Re: [SEL] Re: Pinned Rings - Problems or Not?
>>>Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:59:08 -0400
>>>
>>>Arnie,
>>>You've not burst my bubble :-)
>>>Just threw it out there to see what lively conversation might come of it.
>>>Recall the installation direction for square nuts thread? That was fun 
>>>:-)
>>>Curt
>>>P.S. I might not be wrong. How are we to guess what the engineers at 
>>>Hercules were thinking a 100 years ago?
>>>P.P.S. I cannot recall....does the top ring on the smallest Herc sweep 
>>>over the ignitor hole at TDC? Might that be the reason for pinning?
>>>
>>>
>>>Arnie Fero wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi Curt,
>>>>
>>>>Sorry to burst your bubble bro.  I don't think the angled ends were
>>>>anything like universal on pinned rings.  The Robertsonville shows that
>>>>configuration, but the Bessemer has a semi-circular notch in the ends of
>>>>what are otherwise butt-end rings.  According to Craig that's the normal
>>>>configuration.
>>>>
>>>>See ya,  Arnie
>>>>
>>>>PS - one of the great tragedies of life is the murder of a beautiful
>>>>     theory by a gang of brutal facts.  8-))
>>>>
>>>>Arnie Fero
>>>>Pittsburgh, PA
>>>>fero_ah at city-net.com
>>>>
>>>>On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Curt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>After digesting what both of you have written so well, you have helped
>>>>>me answered a question I have had for a long time. That is, why did the
>>>>>engine manufactures make the ring gaps with an approx. 45° angle 
>>>>>instead
>>>>>of butt ends? Bearing in mind what you have both written, to solve the
>>>>>strange wear pattern that a pinned ring in conjunction with a butt end
>>>>>gap would create, the solution was to make the gap on a 45°. This
>>>>>assured the ring was wiping completely around the cylinder and would 
>>>>>not
>>>>>leave an unworn ridge down the length of the cylinder. Seems kind of
>>>>>obvious now, but until I digested both of your points I had never put
>>>>>the pieces together enough to realize that one was a function of the 
>>>>>other.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>SEL mailing list
>>>>SEL at lists.stationary-engine.com
>>>>http://www.stationary-engine.com/mailman/listinfo/sel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>SEL mailing list
>>>SEL at lists.stationary-engine.com
>>>http://www.stationary-engine.com/mailman/listinfo/sel
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>SEL mailing list
>>SEL at lists.stationary-engine.com
>>http://www.stationary-engine.com/mailman/listinfo/sel
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>SEL mailing list
>SEL at lists.stationary-engine.com
>http://www.stationary-engine.com/mailman/listinfo/sel





More information about the sel mailing list