[SEL] The ultimate belt tension
Richard Strobel
Richard_Strobel7 at msn.com
Sun Sep 26 06:51:42 PDT 2004
Yea, that would be the ultimate Arn. I'll just go with the original for
now.
later,
RickinMt.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Arnie Fero" <fero_ah at city-net.com>
To: "The SEL email discussion list" <sel at lists.stationary-engine.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2004 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: [SEL] The ultimate belt tension
> Hi Rick,
>
> I think all you'll achieve is a lot of belt flop and still have a saw
> blade driving well enough to remove an arm.
>
> Spring the bucks for a clutch pulley for the engine.
>
> After looking for ~6 years, I finally found one at Portland for my Light
> Six Sandwich buzz saw rig.
>
> See ya, Arnie
>
> Arnie Fero
> Pittsburgh, PA
> fero_ah at city-net.com
>
> On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Richard Strobel wrote:
>
> > I don't know if I can do it, but I'd like to be able to disengage the
> > belt
> > tensioner on the saw outfit and have the blade stop. The pulley's are
> > 24"
> > and 6" in diameter. This makes the belt circumference 176" If I make
> > the
> > belt as long as possible so that when the tensioner is disengaged, and I
> > have the most slop availabe, do ya'll think the belt will slip and the
> > blade will stop? Personally I doubt it, but thot I'd ask.
>
> _______________________________________________
> SEL mailing list
> SEL at lists.stationary-engine.com
> http://www.stationary-engine.com/mailman/listinfo/sel
>
More information about the sel
mailing list