[SEL] Runners vs Non-runners

Steve Royster steve_royster at hotmail.com
Mon Dec 15 10:47:29 PST 2008


Oh Dear Brother, let's be careful!!!!  
           How about the Novo "stationary engine" that's been anchoriing your workbench for the last decade, Speaking of Anchor , how about the rare Lathrop boat anchor you have, Or the real rare Alamo Tray cooled vertical that Vinny Cavalere donated to your museum if you would get it going.  Or the Big 6 hp Novo that I ruined my eyes welding up your cam gear years ago. Or the  Carlisle and finch paperweight on your desk , Or the Stewart little Major that hasn't moved since it was stolen from under your blue tarps and you chased the thief through a schoolyard full of little children, causing him a long prison sentence whereby he Died in Prison because of you! Do you feel bad now because I can keep going for hours about your "running "engines. How about all those engines I  generously hauled home for you from far away places..... and they rust away in your back forty..... How shameful....  Your loving caring brother, Steve
   ps, and we shan't forget the "Elmyra"  either!  
   pps, Or the Hercules that used to run until it ran through your shop wall unattended! 
 
 
 
 
 
 
> From: mr at carolina.rr.com> To: sel at lists.stationary-engine.com> Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 20:28:46 -0500> Subject: Re: [SEL] Runners vs Non-runners> > I don't think my brother's (who suffers from chronic "convenient memory") > statement is entirely correct. I don't think the Bamford (or "Limey > Bastard" as he so affectionately calls it) has run in years, maybe decades. > And as well as I remember there is a two tone Stickney that fired at > Portland 5 years ago and never since. Then there is the Foos he got at > Arden 7 years ago that has never drawn a breath. Oh the shame of it all!!!!> > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steve Royster" <steve_royster at hotmail.com>> To: "The SEL email discussion list" <sel at lists.stationary-engine.com>> Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2008 3:57 PM> Subject: Re: [SEL] Runners vs Non-runners> > > >> > Bwaaaaaaa Haaaaaaa!!! To tell something like that this close to > > Christmas!!!@ Bwaaaaa haaaaaa! The TRUTH from the Other Royster All of > > mine run at home, None of mine run at shows! What kind of ratio is that? > > Steve Royster> From: mr at carolina.rr.com> To: > > sel at lists.stationary-engine.com> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:50:49 -0500> > > Subject: Re: [SEL] Runners vs Non-runners> > All mine run. Some just > > havent run in a long time. Some are missing parts > OK Ok, almost all of > > my engines run but 3, I think.> > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > > "Best, George" <George_Best at adp.com>> To: "The SEL email discussion list" > > <sel at lists.stationary-engine.com>> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:50 > > PM> Subject: [SEL] Runners vs Non-runners> > > >I was just thinking that > > out of the last 6 engines I've bought, and have> > at home, I've only had > > 2 of them running. Two of the others would> > probably run if I spent a > > day to get a fuel supply hooked up and the> > ignition working. The other > > two!> > should be considered as future projects> > as they are either stuck or > > need repairs before they would run.> >> > I usually try to buy running > > engines as I know I'm terrible about> > finding time to work on the > > non-running engines.> >> > At this time I'd say my non-runners must out > > weigh my runners by 2 to 1.> >> > Does anyone have all their engines in > > running condition? Meaning, if a> > visitor came to your place could you > > run the engine to show them how it> > run.> >> > Does anyone have multiple > > engines and none of them are in running> > condition?> >> > Or what ratio > > of runners to non-runners do you have?> >> > At what point do you decide > > you've got so many non-runners that you'd> > better stop buying more > > engines until you get some of your old ones> > running? ( I know that > > answer: NEVER! As there are too many good deals> > you just can't pass up > > ;-) )> >> > George> >> >> > This message and any attachments are intended > > only for the use of the > > addressee and may conta!> > in information that is privileged and confidential. > > If the reader> > of the message is not the intended recipient or an > > authorized > > representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby > > notified that > > any dissemination of this communication is strictly > > prohibited. If you > > have received this communication in error, please > > notify us > > immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments > > from > > your system.> >> > _______________________________________________> > SEL > > mailing list> > SEL at lists.stationary-engine.com> > > > http://www.stationary-engine.com/mailman/listinfo/sel> > > > > > _______________________________________________> SEL mailing list> > > SEL at lists.stationary-engine.com> > > http://www.stationary-engine.com/mailman/listinfo/sel> > _________________________________________________________________> > You live life online. So we put Windows on the web.> > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/127032869/direct/01/> > _______________________________________________> > SEL mailing list> > SEL at lists.stationary-engine.com> > http://www.stationary-engine.com/mailman/listinfo/sel > > _______________________________________________> SEL mailing list> SEL at lists.stationary-engine.com> http://www.stationary-engine.com/mailman/listinfo/sel
_________________________________________________________________
Suspicious message? There’s an alert for that. 
http://windowslive.com/Explore/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_broad2_122008


More information about the sel mailing list