[SEL] test...now 33...OT

Dave Rotigel rotigel at alltel.net
Tue Apr 17 08:06:47 PDT 2007


Hi Peter,
         We have people here in the USA who argue as you do on this issue. 
In general they are lilly livered cowards who take no responsibility for 
their own lives and safety, but rather expect government to take care of 
them from the cradle to the grave. We call them DEMOCRATS!
         Dave

At 02:07 AM 4/17/2007, you wrote:
>So what do you do let everyone have a gun?Is it a case of shoot first and
>then ask questions?We have a law that says that we can use like force to
>reject an assault or house intrusion ,bloody stupid and quite unworkable but
>a lot less reactionary than your suggestion of arming everyone,It would be
>mayhem!
>I may well be wrong but I heard an '' Expert '' talking this morning and
>saying that firearms are allowed on the campus .Perhaps this is just in
>Virginia.If this is correct then it defies logic!!
>Lyles fundamentalist solutions ........well I think it has been tried and
>you can not account for nutters as in the case in question .It would be
>reactionary rather than some attempt to prevent such things happening.
>A statistic I heard .....in the world there are an estimated 6 million hand
>guns ,2 million are in the US. Don't know where these stats came from ,maybe
>they are correct ,maybe not.
>I think [and this will create a hell of a response ] that the big problem in
>the US and to a lesser degree in Australia is the power of the National
>Rifleman's Association.Correct me if I am wrong but is not their lobbying
>power awesome,not many politicians will stand up to them?
>Finally I would be interested to know which states in the US have gun
>control that works, also to  ask the parents of those kids killed this
>morning what they think about ''The Right To Bare Arms''




More information about the sel mailing list