[SEL] FLV format: was Portland 2007 Video Clips

[Al Harris]

Everybody,

IMHO wmv & flv files are primarily for "real time/streaming" 
viewing and are designed accordingly (speed, size), therefore 
they do not have the same bells and whistles as "quality" 
based formats (xvid, mov, avi [most wrappers] etc).

I have found that a combination of two reprocessors (below) 
that I use, give me good quality image and smaller file size 
from my cameras (Kodak/Pentax).

Super.exe (from eRightSoft)

> http://www.erightsoft.com/home.html

VirtualDubMod.exe

> http://files.filefront.com/VirtualDubModexe/;8399394;/fileinfo.html

And here's a standalone FLV Player if someone wants one.

> http://files.filefront.com/flvplayerexe/;9159129;/fileinfo.html

Cheers,
Al Harris


Tony & Jackie wrote:
> Peter,
> I watched your .avi clips and honestly I don't think they were any 
> clearer than most of the stuff I've put up on YouTube.  I personally 
> like YouTube because their compression makes even the biggest files 
> download relatively quickly.  Whereas it took me about 2 minutes to 
> download the .avi files.
> 
> I put a few videos of my own on YouTube in .mov format (that's the 
> format my particular digital camera saves them in).  I don't know if 
> the .mov format has anything to do with them being clearer, but I've 
> never had any complaints with the way my stuff turns out on YouTube: 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjOo4NYSzh4
> 
> -Tony
> 
> 
> At 01:48 AM 3/9/2008, Listerdiesel wrote:
>> I've given up on getting anything decent in the way of resolution with
>> YouTube, and have set up a new folder for the video clips that we took
>> at Portland last summer.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SEL mailing list
> SEL at lists.stationary-engine.com
> http://www.stationary-engine.com/mailman/listinfo/sel
>