[SEL] FMZ Gear and Timing questions.
William Olson
weolson at wiktel.com
Wed Dec 3 10:03:40 PST 2008
Arnie,
Wednesday, December 3, 2008, 10:29:39 AM, you wrote:
> Hey Tommy,
> We have 2, 4, 6, and 8-cycle engines; why not a half-cycle engine?
> Works for me. In fact, I think if you write up the claims for fuel-efficiency,
> the Obama administration will probably give you a couple of million to develop
> it.
> See ya, Arnie
> PS - And after you spend the money, you can apply for additional research funds
> to work on the 3-cycle engine.
> Quoting Judge Tommy Turner <Lcjudge at scrtc.com>:
>> Well, maybe its a 2 to 1 ratio in reverse. The crank gear has 102 teeth and
>> the engine is actually a 1/2 cycle?
> _______________________________________________
> SEL mailing list
> SEL at lists.stationary-engine.com
> http://www.stationary-engine.com/mailman/listinfo/sel
Maybe we already have 1 cycle engines, i.e. STOPPED, in that case perhaps 1/2 cycle could be "I wish it wasn't stopped".
--
Thanks, William mailto:weolson at wiktel.com
Roosevelt, MN
Outgoing mail checked by Comodo AntiVirus
More information about the sel
mailing list