[SEL] rear tool post...deviates!!!!
Jim and Diane
jd.kirkes at verizon.net
Mon Feb 21 19:02:16 PST 2005
Just thought of another big advantage of a rear cut off. The chips fall out
and do not pile up on the top of the tool. If a chip gets down the side of
the tool it acts like a wedge and in some cases the tool will be broken or
the work piece wrecked or both. Certainly nothing special about a rear cut
off tool, been in use for at least 100 years.
Jim
Jim and Diane Kirkes
Hemet, CA
jd.kirkes at verizon.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Curt" <curt at imc-group.com>
To: "The SEL email discussion list" <sel at lists.stationary-engine.com>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 7:11 AM
Subject: Re: [SEL] rear tool post...deviates!!!!
> Peter,
>
> > the main idea being that they don't lift the headstock
> >shaft when cutting metal as they are on the other side of the job
> >compared with the normal turning tool.
> >
> >
> Peter & Peter,
> OK I'll bite, how are parting forces different than regular turning
> forces? Both exert the same tendence to lift the headstock. But is this
> a problem? I've seen a few of the back parting setups mentioned and just
> figured it was a time saving thing....eliminating a tool change. You got
> my curiosity up.
> Curt Holland
> Gastonia, NC
>
> _______________________________________________
> SEL mailing list
> SEL at lists.stationary-engine.com
> http://www.stationary-engine.com/mailman/listinfo/sel
>
More information about the sel
mailing list