[SEL] Message response time

[Reg & Margaret Ingold]

Hey Dave, I WONDERED when you couldnt hold it any longer!!!
VBG
Not to say that you aint on the right trail!
Reg & Marg Ingold.
Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
randmingold at hotkey.net.au
http://www.oldengine.org/members/randmingold

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Rotigel" <rotigel at alltel.net>
To: "The SEL email discussion list" <sel at lists.stationary-engine.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: [SEL] Message response time


> > Well folks it looks like it is taking anywhere from 6 to 7 hours for any
> SEL
> > message to make it's flight through cyberspace to the List Members, gosh
> if
> > it gets any slower we will have to go the dreaded land lines to
> communicate.
> > I think someone needs to change the mag on the server engine, might run
> > faster...what do you think, maybe a new fuel pump to.
> > Paul
>
> I agree with you 100% Paul! The GREAT importance of ALL the recent posts
to
> the List lends credence to the assertion that something MUST be done
before
> the whole world goes to hell in a hand basket! Idiots could easily take
over
> the Kerry headquarters before anyone receives a post warning us of such an
> impending event. (Oh, wait a minute, that's already happened--but you get
> the idea.) The primary thing that we must all realize is that what we have
> to say is so very important that it needs to be communicated to other List
> members with as little lag time as is possible. In fact, some of the
recent
> discussion on List is so important to the antique engine world that we
must
> find a way to get it to the screens of List members BEFORE the sender
> conceives of the idea!
>     Dave
>
> _______________________________________________
> SEL mailing list
> SEL at lists.stationary-engine.com
> http://www.stationary-engine.com/mailman/listinfo/sel